Park Board · Vancouver 2026

Sacia Burton

Candidate for the Vancouver Park Board.

Sacia Burton, ballot number 215 for Park Board in Vancouver, COPE. Profile focus: Affordable community spaces.

Researched by voche.me · Not a campaign-authored page

COPE2026
Sacia Burton, published by the COPE campaign.
Sacia BurtonPark BoardBallot no.215

This record covers Sacia Burton, the COPE candidate for Park Board at ballot number 215 in the October 17, 2026 Vancouver election. It sets out the party biography, the detailed list of 19 commitments filed with VoteMate, and the party announcements that record the nomination.

Where can you hear Sacia Burton?

No public appearance by this candidate was confirmed in the sources checked on September 22, 2026. The voting dates below apply to every voter. An empty day is a gap in the research, not proof that nothing is happening.

Checked September 22, 2026 · All event times are Vancouver local time. Recheck the organizer before travelling.

View every date through Oct 17
  1. No appearance confirmed
  2. No appearance confirmed
  3. No appearance confirmed
  4. No appearance confirmed
  5. No appearance confirmed
  6. No appearance confirmed
  7. No appearance confirmed
  8. No appearance confirmed
  9. No appearance confirmed
  10. No appearance confirmed
  11. No appearance confirmed
  12. Voting day
  13. No appearance confirmed
  14. No appearance confirmed
  15. No appearance confirmed
  16. Voting day
  17. No appearance confirmed
  18. No appearance confirmed
  19. Voting day
  20. No appearance confirmed
  21. No appearance confirmed
  22. Voting day
  23. No appearance confirmed
  24. No appearance confirmed
  25. No appearance confirmed
  26. Voting day

Voting dates

  • Advance voting
  • Advance voting
  • Advance voting
  • Advance voting
  • Election day

8 am to 8 pm at official Vancouver voting places. These dates apply to every voter and are not candidate appearances. Find your voting place

On dates without a confirmed appearance the public schedule is unknown; the candidate may still have activities that day. This static page changes only when its research is updated.

About Sacia Burton

Sacia Burton appears on the City of Vancouver's final 2026 candidate list for Park Board, with ballot number 215. The City records the affiliation as COPE.

The party page says Burton is Co-director of the BC Poverty Reduction Coalition and has worked in social policy advocacy and organizing in Vancouver.

The COPE parks page describes Burton as co-director of the BC Poverty Reduction Coalition, with knowledge of how government systems work and connections across social policy advocacy and organising in Vancouver.

COPE's August 8, 2026 announcement describes Burton as a BC Poverty Reduction Coalition organiser.

The VoteMate profile describes Burton as a policy advocate and organiser who has worked on housing rights, transit equity and climate action, and who wants to bring those priorities to the Park Board.

COPE members chose the 2026 slate at a meeting at the Rio Theatre in East Vancouver on May 12, 2026, nominating Burton for Park Board alongside T'uy't'tanat Cease Wyss and Jamie Han. Tamiko Suzuki was added as a fourth Park Board candidate on August 8, 2026.

Daily Hive published the final ballot order on September 22, 2026, listing Sacia Burton at number 215 for Park Board under COPE. The COPE parks page shows the same number.

voche.me assembled this profile from the official candidate list and the campaign material linked under Sources. The campaign has not been contacted, and no candidate-supplied content appears on this page.

Read the sources

Commitments and the available evidence.

Published positions and selected commitments, separated by election cycle. Status labels describe the evidence reviewed, not a numerical score or a complete audit of the platform. Council approval is different from delivery.

17 commitments shown · Checked Sep 22

Stop using natural gas heating in public buildings

Phase out natural gas heating in public facilities.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
The VoteMate profile lists this commitment. No date, cost or replacement system is given.
What still needs checking
How many Park Board buildings still use gas heat, and what would replacement cost?

Solar power at community centres

Look at capturing solar energy at community centres.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
The VoteMate profile lists this as something to explore rather than a firm commitment.
What still needs checking
Which buildings would be studied first?

Grow the tree canopy to 30 percent by 2050

Expand the urban forest canopy to 30 percent by 2050, planting native species chosen to survive a changing climate.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
The VoteMate profile gives both the target and the date. It does not state the current canopy figure or the number of trees needed.
What still needs checking
What is the measured canopy figure now, and what planting rate does 30 percent by 2050 require?

Connect walking and cycling routes to community centres

Join up cycling and walking networks so they reach community centres.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
The VoteMate profile lists this. It names no route, and much street work sits with City Council rather than the Park Board.
What still needs checking
Which parts of this would a Park Board commissioner decide?

Light the Expo Line cycleway and path

Add lighting to the Expo Line cycleway and walking path.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
The VoteMate profile lists this. No cost or length of route is given.
What still needs checking
Which body owns the route, and what would lighting cost?

More bike parking at community centres

Add bike racks and secure bike parking at community centres.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
The VoteMate profile lists this. No number of spaces or set of sites is named.
What still needs checking
How many spaces, and at which centres?

Funding to renew three community centres

Secure renewal funding for the Renfrew, Strathcona and Thunderbird community centres.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
The VoteMate profile names all three buildings. It does not give a cost, a funding source or a construction date.
What still needs checking
What is the current capital plan status and cost estimate for each of the three?

Public washrooms open 24 hours

Change public washroom hours from dawn to dusk to 24 hours a day.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
The VoteMate profile lists this. It does not say how many washrooms this covers or what the extra staffing and cleaning would cost.
What still needs checking
How many park washrooms are affected, and what is the added operating cost?

Universal and gender neutral washrooms, and change tables

Add more universal and gender neutral washrooms, and install change tables in public facilities.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
The VoteMate profile lists both items. No sites or counts are given.
What still needs checking
Which facilities lack these today?

Open community centre kitchens for food programmes

Make community centre kitchens available for food literacy programmes.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
The VoteMate profile lists this. It does not name a programme partner or a budget.
What still needs checking
Who would run the programmes, and which kitchens are available?

City greenhouses supplying free seedlings

Look at using city greenhouses to grow free plant starters for households on low incomes.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
The VoteMate profile lists this as something to explore. No greenhouse, quantity or eligibility rule is named.
What still needs checking
Which greenhouses exist, and what capacity do they have?

Coordinate community gardens

Coordinate community gardens so that more people can get growing space.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
The VoteMate profile lists this. It gives no waiting list figure or plot target.
What still needs checking
How long are the current waiting lists for garden plots?

Indigenous names, signage and co-management

Create signage and learning tools that give local Indigenous names for plants and animals, co-manage suitable sites with the Musqueam, Squamish and Tsleil-Waututh nations, and make traditional place names more widely known.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
The VoteMate profile lists these three commitments together. It does not say which sites would be co-managed or whether the three nations have been approached.
What still needs checking
Which sites are proposed for co-management, and what do the three nations say?

Dog parks in Mount Pleasant and Grandview, and better dog park facilities

Create off-leash spaces in Mount Pleasant and Grandview, plant more trees for shade at dog parks, and add water, waste bags and rubbish bins.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
The VoteMate profile lists these items together. No site within either neighbourhood is named.
What still needs checking
Which specific parks would become off-leash areas?

Party platform on parks and recreation

COPE's parks platform sets out real investment in parks and recreation rather than minimum upkeep, affordable recreation, support for vulnerable people, families and children, more cycling infrastructure, tree canopy growth to reduce extreme heat, and facilities that work for families and seniors. This is the party's platform.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
The COPE parks page carries these points for the whole Park Board group. Burton's own quoted words on that page are narrower, covering public spaces where people come together and parks, community centres and public spaces that are affordable, enjoyable and sustainable.
What still needs checking
Which platform points does Burton commit to personally?

Affordable parks and community centres

The party page says Burton would work to keep parks, community centres and public spaces affordable and sustainable for future generations.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
Taken from the campaign page listed in the sources. No independent confirmation was found.
What still needs checking
What would this cost, who would deliver it, and by when?

Public spaces that bring people together

The party page says Burton believes public spaces should be places where people meet, learn and get to know their neighbours.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
Taken from the campaign page listed in the sources. No independent confirmation was found.
What still needs checking
What would this cost, who would deliver it, and by when?

Policies, budgets & programs

Each entry below names its source. Campaign material is the candidate's own account. Nothing here is presented as a verified outcome unless the entry says so.

No reviewed entries have been added to this section yet. This is a research gap, not a finding about the candidate.

Talks, interviews & statements

Read original statements and reporting, or open the publisher’s video. A summary of a speech is labelled separately from a full recording.

No reviewed entries have been added to this section yet. This is a research gap, not a finding about the candidate.

Controversies & public scrutiny

Records are labelled by type, including official findings, civil proceedings and political disputes where applicable. Each entry identifies the response found in the sources and the latest status verified for this page.

No reviewed entries have been added to this section yet. This is a research gap, not a finding about the candidate.

Read the reporting

A dated reading list from independent publishers. The headings below are voche.me summaries; follow each link for the original article, context and any corrections.

Check the evidence

Sources checked September 22, 2026. Official records establish decisions; campaign material establishes stated positions; reporting adds investigation and context. None alone establishes every claim.

Official record 2 sources
Campaign 2 sources
Reporting 1 sources

No news article about Burton was found beyond the ballot listing. Business in Vancouver published a report on the OneCity and COPE slates, but that page refuses automated requests and was not read, so it is not cited here. The personal campaign address that the VoteMate profile gives, saciaburton.votecope.ca, returned a page not found error. Nothing independent confirms the co-director role at the BC Poverty Reduction Coalition, since both statements of it come from COPE. No interview, opinion piece or debate appearance was found. The Mount Pleasant Community Centre Association all candidates meeting on September 23 lists COPE's Park Board participant as still to be announced, so Burton's attendance is not confirmed. No public accountability record was found.

What voche.me has checked

Evidence reviewed on September 22, 2026: Current campaign material; biographical claims require corroboration.

Campaign page read on September 22, 2026. 2 stated positions and 1 background fact recorded here, each checked against a quotation from that page.

Checks still to do: Confirm the organizational role and obtain an individual access proposal.

The ballot name, office, ballot number and party label come from the City's final candidate list. Everything described as campaign material is the campaign's own account and has not been confirmed by an independent source.

Experience & community

As of 2026

Co-director, BC Poverty Reduction Coalition

The COPE parks page names Burton as co-director of the coalition, and COPE's August 2026 announcement calls Burton an organiser with the same group. Neither page gives a start date, and the coalition's own site was not checked.

Park Board candidates page

Questions for the candidate

Proposed questions for a future interview. They have not been sent to the candidate, and no answers have been supplied.

Which recreation fees or eligibility rules would you change, and how would you fund the difference?

No response has been submitted.

How would you divide funding between existing-facility maintenance, affordable access and new construction?

No response has been submitted.

Space for campaign updates

No campaign updates yet

Announcements, event details and messages can be added here, with their source and publication date. No campaign submission has been added.

Sources & transparency

Missing information does not imply a candidate’s position. Read our editorial standards.

Campaign contact

Campaign links & contact.

Find the candidate’s website, social accounts and contact information.

View more candidates.

All candidate spaces