Park Board · Vancouver 2026

Jon Girard

Candidate for the Vancouver Park Board.

Jon Girard, ballot number 204 for Park Board in Vancouver, TEAM for a Livable Vancouver. Profile focus: Aquatic facilities and decision-making.

Researched by voche.me · Not a campaign-authored page

TEAM for a Livable Vancouver2026
Jon Girard, published by the TEAM for a Livable Vancouver campaign.
Jon GirardPark BoardBallot no.204

This record covers Jon Girard, ballot number 204, running for Vancouver Park Board with TEAM for a Livable Vancouver. Most of the available material relates to the court case Girard helped bring over the size of the pool in the Vancouver Aquatic Centre replacement.

Where can you hear Jon Girard?

1 upcoming public event were found in the sources checked on September 22, 2026. An event being scheduled does not mean this candidate will attend. Attendance is marked separately.

Checked September 22, 2026 · All event times are Vancouver local time. Recheck the organizer before travelling.

Day after this check

Sep 23

Public appearance confirmed

All Candidates Meeting, Mount Pleasant · 7 pm

View every date through Oct 17
  1. No appearance confirmed
  2. Confirmed appearance
  3. No appearance confirmed
  4. No appearance confirmed
  5. No appearance confirmed
  6. No appearance confirmed
  7. No appearance confirmed
  8. No appearance confirmed
  9. No appearance confirmed
  10. No appearance confirmed
  11. No appearance confirmed
  12. Voting day
  13. No appearance confirmed
  14. No appearance confirmed
  15. No appearance confirmed
  16. Voting day
  17. No appearance confirmed
  18. No appearance confirmed
  19. Voting day
  20. No appearance confirmed
  21. No appearance confirmed
  22. Voting day
  23. No appearance confirmed
  24. No appearance confirmed
  25. No appearance confirmed
  26. Voting day

Public forums and announcements

Attendance is identified for each event. Unconfirmed listings are not confirmed candidate appearances.

7 pm

All Candidates Meeting, Mount Pleasant

Mount Pleasant Community Centre, 1 Kingsway

The organisers list Jon Girard as TEAM's Park Board representative at the meeting.

Organised by the Mount Pleasant Community Centre Association and the Strathcona Community Centre Association, with one council candidate and one Park Board candidate listed per party. The moderator is named as Alex Sasha Burton.

Voting dates

  • Advance voting
  • Advance voting
  • Advance voting
  • Advance voting
  • Election day

8 am to 8 pm at official Vancouver voting places. These dates apply to every voter and are not candidate appearances. Find your voting place

On dates without a confirmed appearance the public schedule is unknown; the candidate may still have activities that day. This static page changes only when its research is updated.

About Jon Girard

Jon Girard appears on the City of Vancouver's final 2026 candidate list for Park Board, with ballot number 204. The City records the affiliation as TEAM for a Livable Vancouver.

The campaign says Girard works as a consultant in software and explains technical detail to people who must decide without being experts. The page says Girard was founding managing director of Protecting Our Vancouver Aquatic Centre Society, which raised over $110,000 from the public and filed a court petition over the Aquatic Centre replacement. The campaign says Girard has lived in Vancouver for the last ten years and swims in public pools several times a week.

The TEAM campaign page says Girard works as a software consultant and has lived in Vancouver for the past ten years.

Girard is one of three directors of the Protecting Our Vancouver Aquatic Centre Society. CityHallWatch named Girard, Susan Boutwood and Carlie McPhee as the three directors in July 2025, and the society's own petition announcement lists the same three names.

Daily Hive reported in September 2026 that Girard is one of two directors of that society who are running for Park Board, the other being Mayeli Alvarez.

TEAM announced Girard as a Park Board candidate on August 27, 2026, alongside Mayeli Alvarez and Allan Fawley.

Girard appears at ballot number 204 on the Park Board ballot, listed with TEAM.

The TEAM campaign page says Girard swims at public pools and uses city gyms, and names the Marpole-Oakridge Community Centre.

voche.me assembled this profile from the official candidate list and the campaign material linked under Sources. The campaign has not been contacted, and no candidate-supplied content appears on this page.

Read the sources

Commitments and the available evidence.

Published positions and selected commitments, separated by election cycle. Status labels describe the evidence reviewed, not a numerical score or a complete audit of the platform. Council approval is different from delivery.

11 commitments shown · Checked Sep 22

Halt the Aquatic Centre project

Girard and Mayeli Alvarez say they will move to stop the current Vancouver Aquatic Centre project and reopen the planning so that a ten lane, fifty metre public pool is built and operating on the site.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
The pledge is set out in the September 1, 2026 post on the society's website, written by the two candidates. The post does not say how many of the seven commissioners would need to agree, or what the cost of stopping the project would be.
What still needs checking
What would stopping the contracted project cost, and does any other party support reopening the plan?

Public choice before design

Put costed options for a facility in front of the public early and record the public's choice of shape before design work starts.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
Stated in the September 1, 2026 candidates post. The post does not describe the form the recorded choice would take.
What still needs checking
Which decisions would trigger this step, and who would run the vote?

Publish the full option set

Require every major capital decision to be published before the vote with the full list of options, including options staff advise against, a cost estimate for each, and a written reason each rejected option was dropped.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
Stated in the September 1, 2026 candidates post. No draft policy or motion text has been published.
What still needs checking
Would this be a board policy, and how would it apply to work the City runs rather than the Park Board?

Written plan before a facility closes

No facility would close until a written interim programming plan has been given to the user groups affected.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
Stated in the September 1, 2026 candidates post, which refers to eighteen days of notice given to user groups at Britannia. The eighteen day figure comes from the society and was not confirmed in an independent source opened for this record.
What still needs checking
How much notice would the plan require, and who would sign it off?

Stop the process being repeated

Make sure the way the Aquatic Centre replacement was planned is not used again for coming projects such as Kitsilano Pool and other ageing facilities.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
Stated in the September 1, 2026 candidates post. No specific rule or timeline is given.
What still needs checking
Which facility decisions are due in the next term, and what rule would apply to them?

Sharing pool time

Girard says swimming is a life skill and wants pool time shared between learn to swim programs, lifeguard training, school programs, masters swimmers, seniors and people swimming for rehabilitation.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
Stated on the TEAM campaign page. The page does not set out how the time would be divided.
What still needs checking
Which pools are oversubscribed, and what change in scheduling is proposed?

Party position: fifty metre pool and parks funding

TEAM's parks and recreation platform commits the party to $739 million over four years for parks and recreation facilities and to a 50 metre pool in the Vancouver Aquatic Centre replacement.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
This is the party's platform position, published on the TEAM website. Girard cited the same platform when announced as a candidate. The platform page says more than 70 percent of recreation facilities carry one of the two lowest condition grades the page names, "poor" and "very poor", a figure the party does not source on that page.
What still needs checking
Where would the $739 million come from, and over which budget years?

Party position: powers back to the Park Board

TEAM's platform commits to returning finance, operations and facilities to Park Board jurisdiction and to keeping the Park Board elected.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
This is the party's platform position. Girard's stated reason for joining TEAM is the party's defence of an elected Park Board.
What still needs checking
Which specific powers moved to the City, and what would be needed to move them back?

More pool time for swimmers

The campaign says adding aquatic resources will be one of Girard's main areas of work, because learn to swim, school, masters, seniors and rehabilitation swimmers share the same pool hours.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
Taken from the campaign page listed in the sources. No independent confirmation was found.
What still needs checking
What would this cost, who would deliver it, and by when?

Keep the elected Park Board

The campaign says Girard is running with TEAM because the party defended the elected Park Board while the plan to abolish it was still active.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
Taken from the campaign page listed in the sources. No independent confirmation was found.
What still needs checking
What would this cost, who would deliver it, and by when?

Give residents a say locally

The page says Girard wants residents to have real power over decisions about their own neighbourhoods, and would work on the process from inside the board.

Evidence & next checks
Evidence reviewed
Taken from the campaign page listed in the sources. No independent confirmation was found.
What still needs checking
What would this cost, who would deliver it, and by when?

Policies, budgets & programs

Each entry below names its source. Campaign material is the candidate's own account. Nothing here is presented as a verified outcome unless the entry says so.

No reviewed entries have been added to this section yet. This is a research gap, not a finding about the candidate.

Talks, interviews & statements

Read original statements and reporting, or open the publisher’s video. A summary of a speech is labelled separately from a full recording.

Statement

Statement on joining TEAM

In TEAM's announcement of three Park Board candidates, Girard said TEAM was the only party that had put its answer on the Aquatic Centre pool in writing, and pointed to the party's parks platform and its commitment to fund the Park Board capital plan.

Statement

We're Running for Park Board

A post co-signed by Girard and Mayeli Alvarez on the society's website setting out five commitments, covering the Aquatic Centre project, consultation before design, published option sets for capital decisions, written plans before facility closures, and stopping the same process being used again.

Statement

Statement after the petition was dismissed

The society said the disagreement with the court is about the standard a court uses to review this kind of decision, said it believes there is a basis for an appeal within the thirty day window, and asked the City to postpone the demolition set for October 1, 2026. The post urges voters to ask Park Board candidates whether they will halt the project.

Controversies & public scrutiny

Records are labelled by type, including official findings, civil proceedings and political disputes where applicable. Each entry identifies the response found in the sources and the latest status verified for this page.

Judicial review petition dismissed

The society Girard directs asked the Supreme Court of British Columbia to overturn the decision to build a 25 metre pool at the Vancouver Aquatic Centre, arguing it did not match what voters were told in the 2022 plebiscite. The court dismissed the petition. Daily Hive reported the dismissal on September 15, 2026 and the society posted on September 16, 2026 that Justice Giaschi delivered the decision orally with written reasons to follow.

Candidate or party response

The society said it disagrees with the standard the court applied, said it believes it has a basis for an appeal, and asked the City to delay the demolition set for October 1, 2026 so an appeal could proceed.

Verified status and limits

The petition was dismissed. As of September 22, 2026 no appeal filing had been confirmed in a source opened for this record.

Dispute with the Park Board chair over an email

The society published an email it says the Park Board chair, Tom Digby, sent to Girard and one other director late on the evening before a board vote on demolition contracts. The society published the email in full and described it as an attempt to discourage its legal challenge. This account and the published email come from the society's own website.

Candidate or party response

No published reply from Tom Digby or from the Park Board beyond the email itself was found in any source opened for this record.

Verified status and limits

No independent report of the exchange, and no finding by any body, was found in a source opened for this record.

Read the reporting

A dated reading list from independent publishers. The headings below are voche.me summaries; follow each link for the original article, context and any corrections.

Daily Hive

Demolition of a beloved Vancouver pool is set to proceed

Reports that the B.C. Supreme Court dismissed the society's challenge, finding that the binding authority came from the wording of the borrowing bylaw and the plebiscite question rather than from supporting documents that described a 50 metre pool. Names Girard as one of two society directors running for Park Board.

CityHallWatch

How three citizens are taking City Hall to court over the Aquatic Centre pool

Names Girard, Susan Boutwood and Carlie McPhee as the three directors behind the judicial review, and describes the challenge to the June 18 council decision approving $170 million for a redesigned Vancouver Aquatic Centre.

Check the evidence

Sources checked September 22, 2026. Official records establish decisions; campaign material establishes stated positions; reporting adds investigation and context. None alone establishes every claim.

Official record 2 sources
Campaign 6 sources
Reporting 2 sources
Event organizer 1 sources

CBC News articles about the Aquatic Centre case return HTTP 403 to automated requests and were not opened, so reporting attributed to CBC is left out of this record. The two sources differ on the date the court gave its decision: Daily Hive published its report on September 15, 2026 and the society says the decision was delivered on September 16, 2026. The $110,000 fundraising figure comes from the campaign and the society, with no independent audit found. The TEAM campaign page lists an Instagram handle that belongs to a different name, so no social account is recorded here. No record of Girard holding elected office was found.

What voche.me has checked

Evidence reviewed on September 22, 2026: Current campaign material; biographical claims require corroboration.

Campaign page read on September 22, 2026. 3 stated positions and 3 background facts recorded here, each checked against a quotation from that page.

Checks still to do: Verify organizational responsibilities and use actual court orders and City documents for descriptions of proceedings.

The ballot name, office, ballot number and party label come from the City's final candidate list. Everything described as campaign material is the campaign's own account and has not been confirmed by an independent source.

Experience & community

2025 to 2026

Managing director, Protecting Our Vancouver Aquatic Centre Society

The society filed a judicial review petition in the Supreme Court of British Columbia in August 2025 against the City of Vancouver and the Park Board over the decision to build a 25 metre pool in place of the 50 metre pool the society says voters approved in the 2022 plebiscite. The society's own page says it raised more than $110,000 from the public and retained legal counsel.

Jon Girard for Park Board
Stated as current in 2026

Software consultant

The TEAM campaign page says the work involves turning detailed technical information into a form that decision makers can use. No employer is named.

Jon Girard for Park Board

Questions for the candidate

Proposed questions for a future interview. They have not been sent to the candidate, and no answers have been supplied.

What pool capacity, cost and construction timetable would your preferred plan provide?

No response has been submitted.

How would you divide funding between existing-facility maintenance, affordable access and new construction?

No response has been submitted.

Space for campaign updates

No campaign updates yet

Announcements, event details and messages can be added here, with their source and publication date. No campaign submission has been added.

Sources & transparency

Missing information does not imply a candidate’s position. Read our editorial standards.

Campaign contact

Campaign links & contact.

Find the candidate’s website, social accounts and contact information.

View more candidates.

All candidate spaces