--- title: "Richmond City Council to vote Monday on declaring no supervised consumption site" description: "Richmond City Council will hold a final vote on November 9 on a declaration that it will not explore a supervised consumption site in the city, after an earlier committee meeting advanced the motion over one councillor's request for a delay." canonical_url: "https://voche.me/bc/richmond-2026/news/richmond-council-consumption-site-vote-november-2026" last_updated: "2026-11-07T17:32:08.145Z" --- Richmond City Council is scheduled to vote on November 9 on a declaration that the city will not explore a supervised consumption site. The vote comes three weeks after a new council took office and follows an issue that shaped the October 17 election. Councillor [Laura Gillanders](/bc/richmond-2026/candidates/laura-gillanders) brought the motion at a General Purposes Committee meeting on November 6, 2026, telling Richmond News that she wanted to start the new term with clarity on an issue many voters asked about during the campaign. The motion advanced over a request to delay it. The final vote is at the open council meeting at 7:00 pm on November 9 at Richmond City Hall. ## What the declaration says The declaration states that Richmond City Council is not exploring a supervised consumption site in the city. Gillanders told Richmond News that she confirmed with city staff that no outstanding referral exists, and that there is nothing for staff to work on. "I think it's best to start off this term with some clarity," Richmond News quoted her as saying. "I think this is something we can all agree to." A supervised consumption site is a facility where people who use drugs can do so under medical staff supervision, have substances tested, and receive support. Vancouver Coastal Health, the regional health authority for the area, determines whether such a facility is needed in a given location. ## How the issue reached the new council In February 2024, the previous Richmond City Council voted 7-2 to direct staff to work with Vancouver Coastal Health on whether a supervised consumption site near Richmond Hospital was feasible. Richmond News reported that the vote triggered rallies and two nights of public input at city hall. Vancouver Coastal Health responded by saying a supervised consumption site was not needed in Richmond. Former Mayor Malcolm Brodie then wrote a letter saying the matter was closed. Gillanders told Richmond News that the letter did not seem to be enough for the public. Many residents continued to believe the city was still pursuing the idea, she said. The issue carried through the fall election, with candidates on multiple teams stating their opposition. Gillanders was part of the previous council and voted on the original 2024 motion. She told Richmond News she confirmed with city staff that no work remained on the item and that a formal declaration would give the community the clarity the letter did not. ## What the election brought in Opposition to a supervised consumption site was a platform commitment for several candidates who ran in October, Richmond News reported. Mayor Rob Howard's campaign platform called for banning supervised injection sites in Richmond. His tracked campaign promise is listed on the promise tracker at [/bc/richmond-2026/candidates/rob-howard](/bc/richmond-2026/candidates/rob-howard#promise-ban-supervised-injection-sites). Councillor Sheldon Starrett's campaign site said his first agenda item if elected would be to bring a motion overturning the 2024 decision. He told Richmond News the same thing after voting day. His tracked campaign commitment is at [/bc/richmond-2026/candidates/sheldon-starrett](/bc/richmond-2026/candidates/sheldon-starrett#promise-overturn-consumption-site-decision). ## The request for a delay At the November 6 committee meeting, Starrett asked to table the motion to the next committee meeting, scheduled for November 16. His reason, as Richmond News reported, was that community members should have a chance to hear about the motion and that "there might be people wanting to speak on both sides of the issue." The rest of council did not support the delay. The motion advanced to the full council meeting. Gillanders told Richmond News there would be many items in the coming term that are "very controversial," but she said this one could be resolved quickly. "To be able to get this one issue behind and be unified I think is really important and it gives us some solid ground to move forward," Richmond News quoted her as saying. ## What comes next The vote is scheduled for the second regular open council meeting of the month, on Monday, November 9, at 7:00 pm in Council Chambers at Richmond City Hall. Open council meetings are held on the second and fourth Mondays of each month, according to the city council records website at citycouncil.richmond.ca. If the motion passes, the declaration on record would formalize what city staff and VCH have already said: that Richmond has no active process to open a supervised consumption site. It would also put a written record on file at the start of the 2026-2030 term, so residents and future councils can see clearly what was decided and when. For Mayor Howard, it moves one of his stated first-term commitments from "not started" toward done. For Councillor Starrett, who put overturning the 2024 decision at the top of his campaign agenda, the vote is the direct follow-through on that pledge. You can follow the work of the Richmond City Council and the Board of Education at [/bc/richmond-2026/tracker](/bc/richmond-2026/tracker). The public can attend the November 9 meeting in person at Richmond City Hall, submit written comments before the meeting, or join by phone or Zoom. Registration details for public participation are on the city council website at citycouncil.richmond.ca. ## Sitemap See the full [sitemap](/bc/richmond-2026/sitemap.md) for all pages.